Department of Nephrology, SAIMS, Indore, India
Biography:
Dr.Trishala Chhabra Khanna is presently working as Consultant Nephrologist at DNS Hospitals,a private hospital in Indore,(M.P.),India. She has done MBBS from Government MGM Medical College,Indore,(India).Then she pursued MD in Internal Medicine from Government NSCB Medical College,Jabalpur (India).She thereby pursued superspecialisation in the form of DM in Nephrology from SAIMS,Indore (India).She also served in Covid Pandemic in Goverment MY Hospital in Indore,India.She is passionate about Nephrology and has special interest in Critical Care Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation.
OBJECTIVE :1. To study the incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage V patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) at our center.2. To compare clinical and metabolic variables among CKD patients with and without PH to search for possible etiologic factors. 3.Comparison of PH in CKD patients at baseline and after 3 months of sildenafil therapy.
METHODS : The study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, for a period of 1 year from December 2021 to November 2022. All CKD patients on maintenance HD at our center were included in the study. A pre-structured proforma was used to record patient data. Detailed clinical examination, 2DECHO, and Biochemical tests were done. All patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 25 mmHg on 2D echocardiography were considered to have PH and were started on sildenafil therapy 20 mg three times a day for 3 months. PH was classified as mild PH (mPAP > 25 up to 40 mmHg), moderate PH (mPAP > 40 mmHg to 60 mmHg), and severe PH (mPAP > 60 mmHg). Patients were then followed for 3 months to look for episodes of dyspnea and emergency admissions and reassessed after 3 months by repeat 2D echocardiography to find improvement in PH.
RESULT : A total of 102 patients were analyzed during the study period; among them, 40 patients (39.2%) had PH. Out of them, 18 patients (45%) had mild PH, 14 patients (35%) had moderate PH, and 8 patients (20%) patients had severe PH. Average age of our patients was 48.8 ± 9.4 years, the majority being men. On comparing the clinical features between patients with and without PH, none of the clinical parameters had any statistically significant impact on PH. Also, none of the laboratory parameters had statistical significance among PH and non-PH groups. Among the patients with PH, 25 patients (62.5%) had Arteriovenous (AV) fistula, 10 patients (25%) had temporary dialysis catheters,8 patients (20%) had jugular catheters, 2 patients (5%) had femoral catheters, and 5 (12.5%) patients had tunneled jugular catheters. Initially, 102 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 40 (39.2%) had PH and 62 (60.7%) did not. Patients who had PH started sildenafil 20 mg three times a day. Of these 40 patients, at 3 months, eight patients were lost to follow-up, and 32 patients with PH remained in the study. The mean PH at baseline was 47.8 ± 8.9 mmHg and at 3 months the mean PH was 44.4 ± 7.8 mmHg. mPAP at baseline and at 3 months was compared with the severity of PH. After 3 months, there were 14 patients with mild PH, 11 patients with moderate PH, and 7 patients with severe PH. After treatment, five patients downgraded from mild to no PH, four patients from moderate to mild PH, and three patients from severe to moderate PH. Emergency admissions in each group of PH declined after 3 months, and the result was statistically significant. Echocardiographic findings were compared in patients with PH and without PH, but the difference in patients on HD with PH and without PH was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION : PH is a significant problem in CKD patients on HD. This issue needs to be evaluated in a timely manner to avoid the risk of morbidity and mortality. It is vital to treat them at the earliest to prevent life-threatening complications.