BioXcellerator, Medellin, Colombia
Biography:
Dr. Ramirez is a physician from the University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia. He obtained a degree as a Specialist in basic biomedical sciences with an emphasis on human anatomy and embryology from the same university. He also had a degree as a Specialist in Emergency Medicine from CES University, Medellin, Colombia. Moreover, he obtained a master’s degree in health administration from CES University. He has more than 20 years of experience as a university professor and has served as an emergency services coordinator at various Colombian hospitals and clinics. Currently, he is a member of the Colombian Association of Specialists in Emergency and Emergency Medicine (ACEM). He has a research interest, participating as a teaching evaluator of research projects at the San Martín University Foundation in Colombia. Actually, he serves as medical director in BioXcellerator (Medellin, Colombia) a leader clinic that serves patients by offering regenerative and ortho-biological therapies. There, Dr. Ramirez carries out administrative and healthcare tasks and articulates the different areas of the clinic, focused on improving patient care.
Shoulder pain syndrome is a multifaceted condition that requires a comprehensive approach for effective management. This approach should encompass both the conventional orthopedic perspective and regenerative medicine strategies. The direct and indirect costs associated with the management of shoulder pain in primary care can be substantial, including expenses related to sick leave, medication, absenteeism from work and sports, sleep disturbances, financial burden, and delayed functional return to sports practice, among other consequences. Shoulder injuries, particularly those caused by overuse such as rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT), impingement, labrum injuries, and bursitis, can significantly impact the quality of life of athletes and the wider population. Furthermore, even after arthroscopic surgery, re-tears can occur, leading to ongoing shoulder pain and loss of function. Managing these injuries solely through arthroscopic repair and physical therapy can be challenging in orthopedics due to issues such as poor healing, adhesion formation, and fatty tissue accumulation. The above justifies the need for research and innovation in the development of ortho-regenerative therapies that contribute, in a complementary manner to conventional orthopedic management, to the reduction of pain and functional limitation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a variety of ortho-biologicals that have demonstrated considerable potential in promoting tendon remodeling and fibrocartilage formation, leading to enhanced biomechanical strength in the tendon. MSCs are characterized by their remarkable proliferation capacity, potent paracrine action, and pluripotency for the differentiation into various cell types. Moreover, the extracellular vesicles originating from MSCs can facilitate collagen production, reduce inflammation, and minimize adhesion formation by transporting regulatory proteins and microRNAs. Consequently, MSC-based therapy shows great promise as a therapeutic strategy for the healing of rotator cuff. Despite the significant surgical advancements to address rotator cuff tears, the effective connection between tendon tissue and bone remains a persistent challenge. However, MSCs offer a glimmer of hope, as they have demonstrated remarkable paracrine, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenic benefits. The MSC-based therapy, which entails growth factors and specific scaffolds, aims to enhance the biomechanical strength of the rotator cuff and promote fibrocartilage formation. While the studies have shown great promise, more research is necessary to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the therapy in shoulder and elbow injuries, including clinical trials and observational studies. For this reason, we are delighted to share the experience of a clinical and research center that has treated patients with shoulder overuse injuries (SOI) such as RCT, impingement syndromes, labrum injuries, and bursitis using Wharton Jelly Derived-Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (WJ-MSCs). These MSCs were delivered locally, both into the glenohumeral joint and by intratendinous injections. Methodology. One retrospective cohort was analyzed according to the effects following therapy based on WJ-MSCsin SOI patients. Ethical approval was obtained by an institutional review board (IRB). Patients signed an informed consent form. SOI patients were treated with a single dose of 70x106 WJ-MSCs per target shoulder (MSCs were delivered 20x106by intraarticular and 50x106 by intratendinous injections) by an ultrasound-guided procedure. Previously, the allogeneic WJ-MSCs were expanded in a culture medium supplemented with 10% human platelet lysate (hPL) up to passage 7. Cell marker expression and in vitro differentiation to mesodermal lineage and microbiological tests were verified. Clinical outcomes were measured by the Short-Form12 questionnaire, Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire at baseline (pre-therapy time), followed by 3-, 6- and 12-month measurements. Following previous literature, a responder to therapy was defined as a patient with a reduction of at least 2 points or more in the VAS score and a reduction of 10 points or more in the DASH score at the last available follow-up to baseline (pretherapy scores). Findings. From November 2021 to May 2023, 88 patients were treated at the institution and met the eligibility criteria for therapy, of which all responded to the 6-month follow-ups, and 25 (28.41%) completed the questionnaires at 12-month follow-ups. The mean age was 52.36 years old (SD 13.85). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.92 (SD 4.30). 84% (n= 74) were men. The most frequent country of origin was the USA (n= 68, 77%). 56% (n= 49) of patients had both shoulders treated, 20% (n= 18) received WJ-MSC in the left shoulder only and 25% (n= 21) in the right shoulder only. 47/88 patients (53.41%) responded favorably to therapy at 6 months, and 18/25 (72%) responded to therapy at 12 months. The 6-month VAS was significantly reduced compared to baseline (median baseline VAS= 5, IQR 2.25, median 6m VAS= 2, IQR 4, p< 0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p= 0,018 Shapiro-Wilk assumption-normality test), as was the 12-month VAS (median baseline VAS= 5, IQR 2.25, median 12m VAS= 2, IQR 3, p< 0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p= 0,042 Shapiro-Wilk assumptionnormality test). The 6-month DASH was significantly reduced compared to baseline (median baseline DASH= 31.25, IQR 24.99, median 6m DASH= 13.33, IQR 20.21, p< 0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p< 0,001 Shapiro-Wilk assumption-normality test), as was the 12-month DASH (median baseline DASH= 31.25, IQR 24.99, median 12m DASH= 11.67, IQR 18.34, p< 0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p= 0,011 Shapiro-Wilk assumption-normality test). The 6-month SF-12 Physical score was significantly increased compared to baseline (median baseline SF12-physical= 57.14, IQR 35.72, median 6m SF12-physical= 64.29, IQR 35.71, p <0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p= 0,047 Shapiro-Wilk assumptionnormality test), as did the 12-month SF-12 Physical score (mean baseline SF12-physical= 53.40, SD 21.50, mean 12m SF12- physical= 70.78, SD 21.06, p= 0,008 t-paired test, p= 0,064 Shapiro-Wilk assumption-normality test) and the 6-month SF12 Mental score (median baseline SF12-mental= 61.90, IQR 38.09, median 6m SF12-mental= 76.19, IQR 40.48, p <0,001 Wilcoxon W test, p= 0,011 Shapiro-Wilk assumption-normality test). No adverse events were noted.